Friday, February 28, 2020

Idealism and Reality Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Idealism and Reality - Essay Example As everyone do not own same attitude towards life, some people love to take life as a challenge. They are not influenced by emotional attachments, rather they like solitary freedom. Christopher was one of them. Let us focus on different angles of his character reflected in the story. Christopher was an intelligent student as well as a good athlete. We can consider him as philanthropic as he had a soft corner for homeless and foodless people and always helped them. He was very pertinacious and determined. He did only those things he wanted to do. Nobody could change his decision. According to his father, he was overconfident as he got success in everything he did in his life. He was also very impatient. He was inspired by the great novelist Leo Tolstoy who relinquished his all in search of self discovery and Christopher followed his steps. The goal of his life was to search his true self. We can summarize his character as a dreamy young man passionate about the truth of life and tried to discover the same in his own way. As reality is completely different from dreams, his naive mistakes finally caused his death. But we should appreciate his courage and obsession towards his dreams. According to American civil rights activist Jesse Jackson, "No one should negotiate their dreams. Dreams must be free to flee and fly high." Christopher must have the same belief. If we look into the flow of his life, we will see that he always furnished his dream with the highest priority. Christopher had a luxurious life as he belonged to a wealthy family in Washington D.C. He completed his graduation in 1990 from Emory University. He had a loving family along with plentiful money in his savings account. He was also offered a good job. He was getting everything which is dream of each common man. But he declined to enjoy these comforts and donated everything he owned. He cut off his bond with family and friends and tramped around different places of USA. But he did not settle anywhere. His pleasant personality affected and impressed every one he met during his short lifespan. Finally he decided to spend some days in Alaskan Wilderness. He was well aware of the fact that this trip ma y be his last one but he wanted to live his dream. With the help of a truck driver he reached Alaska and managed to find a deserted bus which he made his base camp. But in his fascination he did some foolish mistakes. He did not carry enough food with him as he found hunting more exciting. He did not take a compass or watch even a map with him. It was the greatest mistake which he compensated by giving away his life. Though he has done so many mistakes, we should value his determination and willpower as without nominal amenities of daily life he managed to stay there more than two months. At last he realized

Tuesday, February 11, 2020

USING YOUR MANAGER SKILL Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

USING YOUR MANAGER SKILL - Essay Example According to the Lanham Act, trademark infringement and any representation which has the possibility of confusing consumers on the origin and the description of the goods is prohibited. The Act provides that there are three distinct elements which have to be established by the plaintiff to warrant an injunction and damages for trademark infringement. The first element to be is that the plaintiff, safe Choices in this case, has a valid claim over the mark and that the mark is registered or capable of being registered. The plaintiff must also show that the defendant used the mark and that the mark was used in commerce and the use in commerce was without the consent of the plaintiff who is the owner of the mark (WIPO, 1997). Finally, the plaintiff has to show that the use of the name has the effect of causing confusion to the consumers, in that it misrepresents on the origin or the manufacturer of the goods and the use in essence creates a relationship between the plaintiff’s pro ducts and the defendant’s products. Safe Choices have to show that they own the trademark that should be easy because Safe Choices already registered that trademark in 2002. The fact that its already registered means that it’s a valid trademark capable of being protected as a plaintiff cannot prevent others from using a name that does not belong to him. Therefore, in this case, Safe choices have to prove that the defendant used the trademark, and the use is an action thing and should not be lightly interpreted to curtail the functions of the defendant. The use in this case is valid, since Simply Green Company printed the name on its packaging materials and used the name to market the packaging materials. The second element to be is that the use was in commerce, and the use in commerce means that the defendant used the plaintiffs name in activities that bring economic